Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical Center

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1996No. C7-95-2042PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Ida Stroud (Stroud), as trustee for the heirs of Geneva Stroud, commenced this medical malpractice action against Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) and Henne-pin Faculty Associates (HFA) as a result of their alleged failure to timely diagnose and treat a subarachnoid hemorrhage 1 suffered by Geneva Stroud. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of HCMC and HFA and dismissed Stroud’s lawsuit because her affidavit of expert identification failed to meet the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subd. 4 (1996). The court of appeals reversed the district…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Dennie v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Parker v. O'PHELANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Oslund v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Lindberg v. Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Anderson v. RengacharySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Tousignant v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MNSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Teffeteller v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API