Legal Opinion
Parker v. O'PHELAN
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1987No. C8-87-710PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant Dr. Harvey O’Phelan seeks a writ of prohibition for relief from a trial court order extending beyond 60 days the time for respondents Nelson and Eileen Parker to serve an affidavit of expert review as required by Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subd. 2(1) (1986). We affirm.
FACTS
In 1984, respondent Nelson S. Parker was treated by appellant Dr. Harvey O’Phelan. As a result of complications following the initial treatment, Parker consulted with an attorney regarding pursuit of a medical malpractice action. In November 1986, the Parkers initiated this action pro se against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Coller v. Guardian Angels Roman Catholic Church of ChaskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Stroud v. Hennepin County Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Stern v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Anderson v. RengacharySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Oslund v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.