Acampora v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice FLAHERTY,
for the Court.
In this conflict between neighbors over the location of a common boundary, the defendants, Thomas and Linda Pearson, appeal the entry of judgment by a trial justice of the Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff, Anita Acampora, and against the counterclaims of the Pearsons. Acam-pora and the Pearsons own abutting waterfront lots on Seaside Drive in Jamestown. Acampora purchased her lot, No. 19, as well as the dwelling house thereon in 1980 from John and Kate Card. 1 The Pearsons did not acquire their property, lot No. 18, until 2001. 2 Lot No. 18 lies…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wells v. Uvex Winter Optical, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Tavares v. BeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Anthony v. SearleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Locke v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nye v. BrousseauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Corrigan v. NanianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- Carrozza v. CarrozzaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- McGarry v. ColettiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Donna Banville v. Peter BrennanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.