Legal Opinion

Tavares v. Beck

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 29, 2003No. 2001-541-AppealPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In these two consolidated nonjury cases, a Superior Court trial justice found insufficient evidence to establish adverse possession. He then entered judgment in favor of the defendant, Horace P. Beck (Beck), the record-title holder of three adjacent parcels of mostly undeveloped property located on the Little Compton-Tiverton border (the property). The plaintiffs, Lawrence P. Tavares and Edna M. Tavares (the Tavareses or claimants), who are the adverse possessors manqué, appeal from this judgment.

We conclude that the trial justice misconstrued the claim-of-right doctrine when he ruled…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gammons v. CaswellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  2. Sherman v. GoloskieSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  3. Carnevale v. DupeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Anthony v. SearleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Goen v. SansburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Cahill v. MorrowSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Acampora v. PearsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. Dowdell v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Corrigan v. NanianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API