Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kilbane v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2001No. 99-1749PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Leatrice J. Kilbane, appellant, seeks a writ of mandamus directing appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its order denying her motion for a settlement hearing and to grant her this request. The court of appeals denied the writ, holding that Kilbane was not entitled to a settlement hearing based either on the hearing provisions in former R.C. 4123.65 or the proscription in Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution against retroactive laws. On Kilbane’s appeal as of right, we affirm.

Kilbane was diagnosed with an occupational disease in 1991 that resulted from her employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wean Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Kilbane v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jackson v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Romans v. Elder Beerman Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API