Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
At the outset, we observe that this case presents two issues concerning actions by employees against their employers grounded upon an alleged intentional tort: first, whether the recently enacted provisions of R.C. 4121.80, placing various conditions upon all employer-employee intentional tort actions, may be applied retrospectively to cases awaiting decision in a court of appeals on the effective date of that statute; and second, whether summary judgment, in the event of the non-applicability of R.C. 4121.80, was erroneously granted in this case. We answer both queries in the negative, for…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by548 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Russell v. Interim Personnel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
543 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.