Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1993No. 93-943PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue presented by this mandamus action is whether the commission improperly ordered relator’s permanent total disability compensation suspended while relator is incarcerated in a penal institution of this state. For the reasons which follow, we find that the commission suspended relator’s compensation contrary to law.

As a preliminary matter, we note that in its order suspending relator’s compensation, the commission relied upon R.C. 4123.54. It is apparent that the commission was relying upon the last paragraph of R.C. 4123.54(B), which was added to the statute effective August 22, 1986.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Pretty Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API