Legal Opinion

Wean Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1990No. 89-1006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue we are asked to decide is whether R.C. 4123.411(C), effective August 22, 1986,1 retroactively requires self-insured employers to reimburse the bureau for DWRF payments to eligible employees in violation of Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.2 *268For the reasons that follow, we answer this inquiry in the negative and hold that R.C. 4123.411(C), as amended August 22, 1986, does not violate the retrospective provision of Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.

In Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 100, 522 N.E. 2d 489, this court articulated a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kiser v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. EPI of Cleveland, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ComTech Systems, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Kilbane v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Kilbane v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Worthington Custom Plastics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. City of Hamilton v. Fairfield TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API