Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1937No. 26023PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Relatrix maintains Section 1465-90, General Code, is applicable, and controlling of the controversy. Respondent insists such section is not applicable and that relatrix is bound by the provisions of the Public Work-Relief Compensation Act, hereinafter described.

On November 27, 1934, this court rendered a decision to the effect that a "relief worker" receiving a wage "under any appointment or contract of hire" with one of the political subdivisions of the state named in Section 1465-61, General Code, is entitled to the benefits of the Workmen's Compensation Law, when injured in the course of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. HallidayOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ConsilioOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API