Legal Opinion

State v. LaSalle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2002No. 2001-1403PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 178.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. LASALLE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. LaSalle,

2002-Ohio-4009.] Statutory construction—Absent a clear pronouncement by the General Assembly that a statute is to be applied retrospectively, a statute may be applied prospectively only—R.C. 1.48, applied—Criminal law—Statutory law in effect at the time of the filing of an R.C. 2953.32 application to seal a record of conviction is controlling. (No. 2001-1403—Submitted May 22, 2002—Decided August 21, 2002.) CERTIFIED by the Court of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. ConsilioOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API