Legal Opinion

Cooper v. McMurry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1944No. 31391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER* CURIAM.

This action was instituted by W. E. Cooper, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Dr. J. F. McMurry, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of malpractice in the use of an X-ray machine in the making of a diagnosis.

On December 1, 1939, plaintiff went to the defendant, a regular licensed and practicing physician, to be examined for a stomach disorder. The use of X-ray in making a diagnosis was indicated and defendant made a fluoroscopic examination of plaintiff’s stomach. The exposure of plaintiff to the X-ray…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sand Springs Park v. SchraderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Runyan v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Bourguignon v. Peninsular Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Orthopedic Clinic v. HansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API