Legal Opinion

Orthopedic Clinic v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1966No. 41126PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIODGES, Justice.

This action was commenced by Flossie Hanson, the plaintiff, to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of negligence of certain agents and employees of the defendants John E. McDonald, a licensed medical doctor, and the Orthopedic Clinic, a co-partnership. The parties will be referred to in this opinion by their trial court designations.

The plaintiff’s petition alleged that she was receiving therapy treatments under the direction of Dr. McDonald at the Clinic operated by the partnership, which treatments were administered by the agents and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Hudson v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Aderhold v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Greenwood v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Boxberger v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Martin v. StrattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API