Gordon v. Dufresne
California Supreme Court
William L. Kuehn and Arthur S. Loveland for Re-spondent.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This is an action to enforce specific performance of the option clause contained in a written agreement of lease and option entered into by defendant as lessor! with plaintiff as lessee, which provided, in.part, as follows: “That the said Lessor has letten . . . and the said Lessee has hired and taken . . . Lots (describing lots 11-18, inc., Los Angeles county) . . . for a period of two years ... at the total rent of . . . $600, payable ... in equal monthly payments of $25.00, in gold coin of the United States of America, it is also expressly agreed by the Lessor that Lessee may at any time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- De Rutte v. MuldrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Prichard v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- O'Connell v. LampeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Spaulding v. Yovino-YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Crowell v. BralyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. LennonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Bell v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.