Legal Opinion

De Rutte v. Muldrow

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth District. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court. Defendants had judgment; plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.

Ejectment for a tract of land in Sacramento county. The parties claim under deed from John A. Sutter. To maintain the issue on their part, plaintiffs offered a deed from Sutter, dated May 3d, 1850. Appended to the deed is a memorandum signed by Sutter, stating that the deed was made in pursuance of an agreement between all the above parties on the twenty-sixth day of January, 1850. Plaintiffs also introduced another deed from Sutter to them for the same land, dated November 20th, 1850. The defendant offered in evidence a lease, purporting to be executed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billings v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Laffan v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Jackson ex dem. Lewis v. SchutzNew York Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Black v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Schroeder v. GemeinderNevada Supreme Court · 1875

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API