Legal Opinion

People v. Therrian

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 2003No. C040937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

Defendant Michael Therrian appeals from an order of recommitment entered after a jury determined he remains a sexually violent predator under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et. seq. (SVPA)).

In the published portion of this opinion, 2 we conclude that when an expert’s opinion regarding the likelihood of defendant reoffending is not based solely upon the results of a Static-99 test (which assigns a risk assessment of reoffending), a Kelly 3 hearing on the admissibility of expert’s testimony regarding the test is not required.

In the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. DenglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. People v. RoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. PaniaguaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. In re the Detention of BerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API