People v. Stoll
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
We decide whether a criminal defendant charged with committing lewd and lascivious acts upon a child may introduce a psychologist’s opinion testimony, based upon an interview and professional interpretation of standardized written personality tests, that defendant displays no signs of “deviance” or “abnormality.” Under existing law and the facts of this case, the evidence bears on a defense claim that the charged acts did not occur.; Professional testimony regarding the absence of sexual deviance also is authorized under statutory rules permitting a criminal defendant to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.