Legal Opinion

People v. Mendoza

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2000No. S067104PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Under Penal Code section 1157,1 “[w]henever a defendant is convicted of a crime . . . which is distinguished into degrees,” the trier of fact “must find the degree of the crime ... of which he is guilty. Upon the failure of the [trier of fact] to so determine, the degree of the crime ... of which the defendant is guilty, shall be deemed to be of the lesser degree.” Here, we consider this section’s applicability under the following circumstances: (1) the prosecution’s only murder theory at trial is that the killing was committed during perpetration of robbery or burglary, which…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. LindbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API