Legal Opinion

People v. Otto

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2001No. S088807PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case we decide whether Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 6600, subdivision (a)(3) (section 6600(a)(3)), which permits the details of predicate offenses to be proven by documentary evidence in a sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment proceeding, allows the admission of multiple hearsay that does not fall within any exception to the hearsay rule, and if so, whether reliance on this evidence violates a defendant’s right to due process. The Court of Appeal concluded such hearsay was admissible and reliance on the evidence did not contravene defendant’s due process…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API