People v. Otto
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
In this case we decide whether Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 6600, subdivision (a)(3) (section 6600(a)(3)), which permits the details of predicate offenses to be proven by documentary evidence in a sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment proceeding, allows the admission of multiple hearsay that does not fall within any exception to the hearsay rule, and if so, whether reliance on this evidence violates a defendant’s right to due process. The Court of Appeal concluded such hearsay was admissible and reliance on the evidence did not contravene defendant’s due process…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.