People v. McDonald
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We address here a contention that is increasingly heard in the courts of California and our sister jurisdictions, i.e., that it may be an abuse of discretion to exclude the testimony of a psychologist who is a qualified expert witness on psychological factors shown by the evidence that may affect the accuracy of an eyewitness identification of the defendant. As will appear, we hold that on a proper showing such testimony is admissible, and that it should have been admitted in the case at bar.
Defendant was charged in count I with the murder of Jose Esparza. (Pen. Code, § 187.)…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by365 opinions
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
360 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.