Legal Opinion
King v. Alaska State Housing Authority
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1977No. 3052PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
This case is here for the second time. Since the meaning of our opinion and mandate on the first appeal 1 is at issue, we recount the pertinent facts. Appellants proposed to buy and build on certain land owned by Alaska State Housing Authority (ASHA). ASHA rejected this proposal and accepted a competing one from J. L. Johnston. Appellants filed suit against ASHA and Johnston on May 25, 1971 seeking to enjoin ASHA from conveying the land to Johnston and to have themselves declared entitled to purchase it. At the close of appellants’ case, the court granted defendants’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- The Troxel Manufacturing Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Schwinn Bicycle Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Mogg v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaudiane v. LundgrenAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.