Legal Opinion

King v. Alaska State Housing Authority

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1973No. 1613PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

In December of 1970, appellee Alaska State Housing Authority (hereinafter ASHA) issued an Invitation for Proposals for the sale and redevelopment of tracts G-l and G-2 in the Eastchester Urban Renewal Project. Unsuccessful in their competitive proposal to purchase and redevelop tracts G-l and G-2, Earl King and Rod Cherrier appeal from an involuntary dismissal of their suit to enjoin ASHA from conveying their tracts to the “successful” developer, appellee J. L. Johnston,

ASHA is a “public corporate authority” empowered to administer the Alaska Slum Clearance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Tillman v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  4. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Weil & Associates v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. In re the Marriage of CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API