State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is the third appeal arising out of a lawsuit centering on whether Alaska can charge nonresidents more for commercial fishing licenses than it charges resident commercial fishers. The case is brought as a class action by a group of nonresident commercial fishers. In previous rulings in this case, we held that different rates can be charged for resident and nonresident commercial fishers, and we derived a formula for calculating the acceptable difference. The components of this formula, including various budget expenditures and oil revenues, are in…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.