Legal Opinion

State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2003No. S-10091, S-10101PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the third appeal arising out of a lawsuit centering on whether Alaska can charge nonresidents more for commercial fishing licenses than it charges resident commercial fishers. The case is brought as a class action by a group of nonresident commercial fishers. In previous rulings in this case, we held that different rates can be charged for resident and nonresident commercial fishers, and we derived a formula for calculating the acceptable difference. The components of this formula, including various budget expenditures and oil revenues, are in…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API