Mogg v. National Bank of Alaska
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal arises from the remand ordered in Lundgren v. National Bank of Alaska, 756 P.2d 270 (Alaska 1987). Originally, the case concerned the rights of James Lundgren and Henry Mogg, holders of deeds of trust in two properties foreclosed upon by the National Bank of Alaska (“NBA”). 1 In Lundgren, we held that NBA improperly invoked a “dragnet clause” in conjunction with foreclosure of its security interest in the subject properties. Id. at 279-80. We remanded for a new foreclosure or a hearing “in the event that intervening third party rights preclude this…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Gary D. Patton, Cross-Appellant v. Albert E. Guyer, Martha Frances Guyer, Howard Fisher, D/B/A Fisher's I.G.A., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- MacDonald v. RiggsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Dewey v. DeweyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.