Legal Opinion

Gaudiane v. Lundgren

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1988No. S-1958, S-2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal and cross appeal arise from a dispute concerning the terms of a judgment mandated by this court’s decision in Gaudiane v. Lundgren, 723 P.2d 1267 (Alaska 1986) (Gaudiane I).

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case and the first appeal arise from the following facts. Some of the following background information comes from Gau-diane I, 723 P.2d 1267.

Daniel Gaudiane and James Lundgren entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (agreement) which contained three paragraphs. Under paragraph one, Gaudiane was to receive $50,000 for services rendered in negotiating the sale of…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Aiello v. ClarkAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hurd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  4. Dieringer v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Lundgren v. GaudianeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API