In re Home-Stake Production Co. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
RULINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS RE: (1) LIMITATIONS; (2) RULE 12; (3) MASTER’S REPORT RE DISCOVERY
BOLDT, Senior District Judge,
By Designation.
I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ASSERTED BY PLAINTIFFS
Since all of plaintiffs’, allegations concerning the conduct and actions chargeable to Home-Stake Production Company (Home-Stake) must be taken as though they were established facts, an understanding thereof is an essential first step in considering and determining both the Limitations and Rule 12 motions of defendants. Some significant allegations of plaintiffs are now admitted or otherwise established facts.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Adair v. Hunt International Resources Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,391 Roger L. Summer v. Land & Leisure, Inc., Roger L. Summer, Cross-Appellee v. Land & Leisure, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.