Legal Opinion

Morley v. Cohen

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 31, 1985No. Civ. R-83-4198PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RAMSEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on motions by all defendants to dismiss the second amended complaint, as further amended by interlineation. The motions are made pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs oppose the motions, and have filed memoranda in opposition. Notwithstanding plaintiffs’ request for a hearing, the Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 6 without oral argument. The positions of all parties have been briefed thoroughly.

Factual Background

Plaintiffs in this action and in four…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Akzo, N.V.District Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  2. Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Brubaker v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API