Legal Opinion
In re Bennethum
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 28, 1961No. Misc. No. 5PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The Supreme Court of Delaware has entered an order striking the name of William H. Bennethum from the roll of its attorneys and revoking his right to practice law in all courts of that State. The reasons for its action are stated in In re Bennethum, Del.1960, 161 A.2d 229, reargument denied Del.1960, 162 A.2d 429. Upon receiving a certified copy of *542the disbarment order pursuant to the direction of the Supreme Court, this Court entered an order which, after referring to the disbarment by the Supreme Court, temporarily suspended Bennethum from practicing law in this Court, and directed him to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- In Re BennethumSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John H. Gately v. Leonard v. B. Sutton, Otto Moore, Edward C. Day, William E. Doyle, Frank H. Hall, and Francis J. KnaussCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Jones v. HulseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Ginger v. Circuit Court for County of WayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Lenske v. SercombeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967
- Ginger v. Circuit Court for County of WayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.