Legal Opinion

In Re Bennethum

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 26, 1960No. 4, 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

This is a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, William H. Bennethum, a member of the bar of this Court.

The Censor Committee of the Court, pursuant to our direction, held hearings upon several charges of unprofessional conduct. It has filed its report. The Committee finds the respondent guilty of misconduct in three matters and recommends discipli nary action. The respondent excepts to the Committee’s findings and conclusions.

A preliminary question is raised by counsel for the Committee. He contends that Bennethum has waived his right to file with this Court…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. In Re John PercyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. In Re EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In re Removal of CarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. In Re RosenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re LiceagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BromwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware FigliolaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Matter of SullivanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the State LassenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API