Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hulse

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1968No. 18885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This action is a sequel to a disciplinary proceeding in the Supreme Court of Missouri resulting in the suspension of F. Leland Jones, an attorney, from the practice of law in Missouri for a minimum period of three years. The facts underlying Jones’ solicitation of personal injury claims, through the agency of and in conjunction with one Walter Candy, in violation of Rules 4.27 and 4.28 of the Supreme Court of Missouri, V.A.M.R., can be found in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Missouri, not officially published.

A petition for rehearing filed by Jones was denied by the Missouri Supreme…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Neil S. MacKay v. The Honorable Buell A. Nesbett and the Honorable John H. DimondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
  3. Dawn Elaine Brown, by and Through Gayle (Brown) Marden, as Her Mother and Next Friend, Cross v. Dixie Herlong Chastain, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. John E. Goodrich v. Supreme Court of the State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API