Cameron v. City of Richmond
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court in and for the county of Contra Costa in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff sued as a taxpayer of the city of Richmond, a municipal corporation, to obtain a judgment for $13,950 in favor of the city against all of the defendants, except the city of Richmond, which is impleaded as a party defendant, upon an alleged cause of action for money illegally expended and paid to the members of the council of the city of Richmond in monthly payments of $50 each as salary in addition to the compensation they were entitled to receive at the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hirshfeld v. WeillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rogers v. SchulenburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- County of Santa Barbara v. RuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Gwynn v. McKinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Shay v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Polderman v. C. G. Hokanson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Shay v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923