Hirshfeld v. Weill
California Supreme Court
• APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. A. E. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This appeal presents questions arising upon a judgment-roll not containing a bill of exceptions. There are many defendants in the action, and they filed a joint demurrer claiming that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and also claiming that there was a misjoinder of parties defendant. The general demurrer being joint, if a cause of action be skated against any of the defendants it was properly overruled. (Azevado v. Orr, 100 Cal. 293.) The court there said: “So, also, a joint demurrer by all of the defendants must be overruled if the complaint is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by18 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Myers v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bonham National Bank of Fairbury v. Grimes Pass Placer Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.