Legal Opinion
Shay v. Roth
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1923No. Civ. No. 4415PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J., pro tem.
Application for writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as auditor of the county of San Bernardino, to issue a warrant on the county treasurer directing the payment of the sum of three hundred dollars to petitioner as salary due him for the month of May, 1923, as sheriff of said county.
Petitioner was elected to the office of sheriff at the general election held November 7, 1922. His term of office commenced on the eighth day of January, 1923. At the same general election of November 7, 1922, the people of the county of San Bernardino ratified a proposed amendment to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Brown v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Swan Magnetics, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.