Legal Opinion

Polderman v. C. G. Hokanson Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1958No. Civ. No. 22421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.*

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the action after failure of plaintiff to amend following an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint. Plaintiff also appeals from an order denying, in part, his motion to tax costs, but as he has now expressly abandoned the same, no further consideration need be accorded thereto.

Following orders sustaining demurrers to the original and first amended complaints with leave to amend, a second amended complaint was filed. A demurrer interposed to this complaint was likewise sustained and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Haggerty v. WarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. J. P. Armstrong v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Shook v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert O. O'Reilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Robert O. O'Reilly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API