Rogers v. Schulenburg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new-trial. George Puterbaugh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action upon a nonnegotiable promissory note for three hundred and forty dollars, made by the defendants Schulenburg and Chadwick to one Thompson, and by him assigned to the plaintiff before maturity.
The complaint avers the making, delivery, and assignment of the note in the usual form, but the onlyaverment connecting the defendant Daley therewith is: “ That thereafter, and before the maturity of said note, the said defendant, T. J„ Daley, duly indorsed said promissory note by writing on the back thereof as follows, to wit: ‘ Protest waived. T. J. Daley.’”
Defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- First National Bank v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Crooks v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by16 opinions
- Myers v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Boehmer v. Big Rock Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- In Re the Estate of ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Potter v. BlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.