Legal Opinion

County of Santa Barbara v. Rucker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1917No. Civ. Nos. 1916, 1915, 1951, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The appeals in these cases are from the several judgments entered therein. The parties have stipulated that all of them may be heard together upon the same briefs and arguments; the questions presented for consideration here being identical in all of the cases. In accordance with the suggestion of counsel, our references to matters of record will be confined to No. 1916, County of Santa Barbara v. Rucker et al.

Appellant Rucker was elected to the office of supervisor of Santa Barbara County, for the fourth district thereof, at the general election of November, 1908, for the term of four years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Placer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cameron v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. County of Santa Barbara v. TwitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API