Legal Opinion

Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1913No. 2466PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Ottazva County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Wat-tah-noh-zhe and Francis Q. Goodeagle against James K. Moore to cancel a contract for the assignment of royalty, and to cancel a mining lease, etc. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

Wat-tah-noh-zhe is a full-blood Quapaw Indian, and the allottee of the land described in the record, under the provisions of the Act of Congress, approved March 2, 1895, c. 188, sec. 1, 28 St. at L. 907. Francis Q. Good-eagle, also a full-blood Quapaw Indian, is her husband. On June 7, 1897 (Act June 7, 1897, c. 3, p. 1, 30 St. at L. 72), Congress enacted a law providing:

“That the allottees of land within the limits of the Quapaw agency, Indian Territory, are hereby authorized to lease their lands, or any part thereof, for a term not exceeding three years, for farming…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Hixon v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API