Legal Opinion

Hapka v. Agribank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1996No. C9-96-609PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in dismissing by summary judgment his claim for specific performance to repurchase agricultural land under Minn.Stat. § 500.24, subd. 6 (1994) (providing for protection of former family farm owners on the occasion of certain government, partnership, or corporation sales). We affirm.

FACTS

In 1993, appellant deeded the land at issue to respondents AgriBank and Farm Credit Services of Grand Forks (AgriBank) in lieu of foreclosure. Appellant retained the right of first refusal to repurchase the land pursuant to Minn.Stat. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Gale v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. TufteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Rushford State Bank v. KjosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perry v. Honorable Emmet RonanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API