Legal Opinion
Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1994No. C3-94-763, C5-94-764, C7-94-765, C9-94-766, C0-94-767, C5-94-781 and C9-94-1142PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Relators, seven Minnesota motor carriers, seek review of orders issued by the Minnesota Transportation Regulation Board (MTRB). The MTRB’s orders converted relators’ authority from irregular route authority to class I or class II authority, following the revision of the Minnesota Motor Carrier Modernization Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 221.011-.85 (1992). In this appeal, relators challenge the MTRB’s interpretation of certain provisions of the Act. Relators also challenge the extent of the operating authority granted to them. We affirm.
FACTS
Before 1992, Minnesota motor carriers…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Paron v. City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Beane v. Beane, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Gregor v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Hapka v. AgribankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Proposal by US West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.