Legal Opinion

Perry v. Honorable Emmet Ronan

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 2010No. 1 CA-SA 10-0038PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Petitioners, Christopher Perry and Perry Partners, PLLC, doing business as Perry & Shapiro, LLP (collectively, Perry), petitioned this Court for special action relief. Perry challenges the trial court’s order denying its Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement (Motion to Enforce) between Perry and the Real Party in Interest, Bruce R. Bennett (Bennett). For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On September 30, 2008, Bennett brought the underlying action against Perry. On October 6, 2009, the parties met with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re 1996 Nissan SentraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Blake v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. AllingArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Varco, Inc. v. UNS Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Garza v. Hon. gama/swiftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Robertson v. AllingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLINGCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API