Legal Opinion

Rushford State Bank v. Kjos

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 1989No. C2-89-321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Clifton Kjos and Steven Anderson appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action which determined that respondents Curtis and Robin Courrier have a paramount right to purchase agricultural property Kjos previously owned. We reverse.

FACTS

Clifton and Darlene Kjos, as husband and wife, owned and operated a farm in Fillmore County which was mortgaged to Rushford State Bank (Bank). Olga Kjos, Clifton’s mother, held a contract for deed on the farm. The Bank became the fee owner of the property when it foreclosed on the mortgage after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glen Paul Court Neighborhood Ass'n v. PasterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Powers v. SherrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Holterhoff v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Hapka v. AgribankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API