Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Tufte
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 7, 1989No. C5-88-1212PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT E. BOWEN, Acting Judge.
Clayton and Constance Tufte appeal from a judgment of restitution in The Travelers Insurance Company’s unlawful de-tainer action requiring the Tuftes to vacate and surrender 250 acres of farmland. The unlawful detainer action arose as a result of the Tuftes’ holdover of the property and alleged failure to accept an offer to lease agricultural lands within the 15-day time limit prescribed by statute. The Tuftes argue they properly exercised what amounts to a right of first refusal under the statute and ask this court to reverse the trial court’s judgment of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. HugginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson Marketing, Inc. v. Maple Chase Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Rasmussen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Hapka v. AgribankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Anderson Marketing, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Maple Chase Company, Formerly Known as Coleman Safety & Security Products, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Rasmussen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993