State v. Charles
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Now. John P. Butler, Judge. Under the conditions of the bond, when the defendant, Roy Charles., pleaded guilty, the obligation of the bond was fully satisfied, and the clause “not to depart the court without leave,” is- mere surplusage. State v. White-cotton, 63 Mo. App. 12; State v. Poston, 63 Mo. 521; State v. Livingston, 58 Mo. App. 449; State v. Creech, 69 Mo. App. 380; State v. Murmann,' 124 Mo. 502.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
— This cause- is brought to this court by appeal on the part of the defendant, Jamies Charles, from a judgment in the circuit court of Carroll county upon an alleged forfeiture of recognizance. We deem it unnecessary to set forth in detail the entire record applicable to this cause and- shall be content with a *42substantial statement of tbe history of the cause from which this proceeding emanates, tog-ether with a sufficient reference to a recital of the record. Roy Charles of Carroll county, Missouri, was charged upon information filed by the prosecuting attorney with the offense of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PostonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Kiser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- State v. MackeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- State v. MurmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Horn v. Excelsior Springs Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. WrayDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1975
- City of St. Louis v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Suggs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Blair v. Garnett Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.