State v. Mackey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Cass Circuit Court. I. When a defendant is recognized in a criminal case to appear at a subsequent term of the court, that the obligation continues until the record is made discharging him from such recognizance. (State vs. Randolph, 22 Mo., 474.)
1Opinion of the Court
Yoríes, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding by scire facias upon a forfeited recognizance. The facts were as follows:
At the March term of the Circuit Court for Cass county an indictment was found by the Grand Jury of said county •against the defendant Mackey, for unlawfully selling spiritous and alcoholic liquor, without Having subscribed or filed an oath not to adulterate the same, or made or filed the bond according to law in such cases made and provided. A capias was afterwards issued on said indictment, by virtue of which the sheriff of said county arrested…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kiser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by13 opinions
- Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- City of St. Louis v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- State v. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State v. DorrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.