Legal Opinion

Suggs v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM CROCKETT Appeal from Circuit Court, Crockett County. — T. E. Harwood, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

The single legal question to be herein treated of arises out of the facts following:

Suggs was charged with a felony, and Duffy and another were sureties on his recognizance for his appearance before the trial court on a day fixed to answer the State of Tennessee upon a charge of burglary, “defendant not to depart the court without leave.” Suggs appeared and stood his trial, which resulted in a verdict of guilty, after entry of which sentence was pronounced by the court:

“It is considered that for the offense aforesaid the defendant be confined in the state penitentiary for one year, and that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dennard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Roberts v. GordonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Ex parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Commonwealth v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  3. Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. General Casualty Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API