Legal Opinion
Palermo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1932No. 9406PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This is a proceeding by scire facias on a bond forfeiture in a criminal case entitled “United States v. Harry Schwartzberg.” The clerk issued a writ of scire facias as an independent proceeding entitled “United States, Plaintiff, v. Harry Schwartzberg and Frank Palermo, Defendants.” The defendant Palermo filed an answer alleging that he should be discharged from his obligations on the bond given for the appearance of Schwartzberg, for the reason that Schwartz-berg appeared in court pursuant to the terms of the bond and entered a plea of guilty, and that thereafter, and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- United States v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Miner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Mintie v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States of America, and v. Larry Kenneth Gonware, Glenn Holmes Bail Bond AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Thomas Miller, Resolute Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Humberto Martinez, Surety Insurance Company and Cal Rynerson, In79-1189. Appeal of Allegheny Mutual Casualty Co., in 79-2696Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Alfred Catino, Public Service Mutual Insurance Co., Anthony Catino, Theresa Peduto, Mary Mariccio and Jerry DefeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Appearance Bond Surety v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.