City of St. Louis v. Young
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. •— Ron. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. (1) The bond or recognizance taken by tbe officer in charge, at tbe time, of tbe station was not sucb a bond or recognizance as he was authorized to take; and he had no power or authority to take any bond except such as was expressly provided for by the ordinance or charter.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. •— Ron. Wilson A. Taylor, Judge. (1) The bond or recognizance taken by tbe officer in charge, at tbe time, of tbe station was not sucb a bond or recognizance as he was authorized to take; and he had no power or authority to take any bond except such as was expressly provided for by the ordinance or charter. This recognizance omitted the words “to-await his trial upon the charge against him,” which are expressly required by the ordinance; and added the words, “and shall also appear on any future day to which this cause may be continued and…
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, C.
— This is an appeal by Henry Henning, surety in a recognizance for the appearance of defendant Young in the police court of the city of St. Louis to answer a charge of violating a city ordinance, from a judgment of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction on scire facias, enforcing a forfeiture of said recognizance.
Although appellant’s abstract of the record states that certain objections were taken by the appellant in the course of this proceeding, and that a bill of exceptions was signed and filed, there is nothing contained in the abstract indicating what the bill of exceptions *49c…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. LiessingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State ex rel. Hadley v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- City of St. Louis v. RocheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Miller v. Smith's ExecutorsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Consumer Contact Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- City of Rolla v. RidenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Palermo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Dolman v. Dickey.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- In Re MossieDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.