Legal Opinion

State v. Poston

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1876PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from McDonald Circuit Court. cited: State vs. Randolph, 22 Mo. 474; State vs. Potts, 60 Mo. 369.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

Poston was indicted for a felonious assault, and, together with the other defendants, entered into a recognizance in usual form conditioned for the appearance of the party indicted, at the next term of the court, and that he would not depart such court without leave.

Poston defaulted, and in consequence a forfeiture was taken against him and his sureties, and sci. fa. issued. One of the sureties demurred to the writ, and the court, on the ground that the demurrer went to the indictment as well as the sci. fa., entered an order discharging the party indicted, and from such order the State has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. StagerNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  2. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. State v. PottsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. State v. Van HoutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. City of St. Louis v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. State v. MillsapsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. State v. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API