Legal Opinion

Stuttmeister v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1887No. 12168PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Application for a writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

This cause comes up on a writ of review issued to the Superior Court in and for the city and county of San Francisco (department 9).

*488From the record presented, it appears that in 1884 John A. Collins presented a claim for services as attorney against the estate of F. W. R. Stuttmeister, deceased, to W. 0. Stuttmeister, the administrator of such estate, and such proceedings were afterward' had therein that on or about October 10, 1884, such claim was allowed and approved by the Probate Court for three hundred dollars, and ordered to be paid out of the estate in due course of administration.

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re McCAUSLANDCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Canfield v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Evans v. City of American FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Booth v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API