Watson v. Lawson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. N. J. Barry, R. M. Rankin, and W. F. Williamson, for Appellants. Pardee & Pardee, White, Miller & McLaughlin, and C. E. McLaughlin, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appealed from the judgment within sixty days after its rendition. The evidence and proceedings at the trial are embraced in a bill of exceptions.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs, George and FranWatson, own certain lands, being about four hundred acres in extent, that plaintiff, Fred S. Watson, owns other lands to the extent of two hundred and eighty- acres, that Gold Run Creek flows across the land of Fred S. Watson, that plaintiffs are the owners of the right to divert one-half of the waters of said creek and use the same upon their land, that the same has been so…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lakeside Ditch Co. v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wiggins v. Muscupiabe Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte AmbroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Harris v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Aseltine v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Manning v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.