Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Tobias

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Field, C. J. and Norton, J. concurring.

This is an action to recover a balance alleged to be due on an account for goods, wares, and merchandise. The plaintiff obtained a judgment upon the pleadings, and the only question is as to the sufficiency of the answer.

The answer admits that the indebtedness once existed, but avers that certain promissory notes, signed by the defendants and indorsed *350by a third person, were received by the plaintiffs in satisfaction othe debt. It contains a copy of a receipt purporting to have been signed by the plaintiffs, acknowledging that the notes were received in…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Four Star Electric, Inc. v. F & H CONSTRUCTIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API